09:30 to 10:10 |
Hiroshi KORI (The University of Tokyo) |
Parameter inference based on phase oscillator models from oscillatory or spike data (Online) ynchronization of rhythmic units is essential for various biological functions. The synchronization mechanism is often governed by neural networks. For example, the circadian rhythm in mammals functions by synchronizing the gene expression rhythms of individual neurons within a neural tissue called the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Various movement patterns observed in animal locomotion, such as walking and swimming, are generated by neural networks known as central pattern generators. The synchronization dynamics of oscillator groups strongly depend on the heterogeneity of intrinsic frequencies, noise intensity, and the interaction network. If these factors can be estimated from observations, it can aid in understanding, predicting, and controlling the system, and contribute to elucidating the design principles of robust systems. However, estimation involves many challenges. Among them, estimation becomes exponentially difficult as the model's dimensions and the number of parameters increase. Therefore, it is desirable to assume a model with as low dimensions and as few parameters as possible. In the synchronization phenomena of oscillator groups, the phase oscillator model is expected to be useful. This presentation introduces research on estimation using the phase oscillator model [1,2]. [1]A Matsuki, H Kori, R Kobayashi: Network inference from oscillatory signals based on circle map, arXiv:2407.07445 (2024) [2]F Mori, H Kori: Noninvasive inference methods for interaction and noise intensities of coupled oscillators using only spike time data, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, e2113620119 (2022)
|
|
|
10:10 to 10:50 |
Sanjay Sane (NCBS, Bengaluru, India) |
Sensing and flying in hawkmoths Flying insects must balance the demands of speed and agility with the precision of their movements to swiftly and accurately respond to environmental stimuli. Achieving this balance requires them to integrate sensory information from various modalities. Of particular importance are visual inputs from their compound eyes and mechanosensory inputs from their antennae, which are crucial for maintaining flight stability. This challenge is particularly pronounced in insects like hawkmoths, which navigate under low light conditions. Prior studies on diverse hawkmoths and other insects have highlighted the critical role of antennal mechanosensory feedback in flight control, akin to the function of halteres in flies. How is such multisensory integration achieved? We addressed this question by conducting recordings from descending neurons in the cervical connective nerve in the Oleander hawkmoths, Daphnis nerii. The moths were provided with visual stimuli comprised of moving spots of light and mechanical stimuli to their antennae. While these stimuli were presented singly or concurrently, we recorded intracellularly from axons of descending interneurons to determine if they respond to one or both stimuli. In addition to a number of exclusively visual or mechanosensory descending neurons, we also identified several neurons that multiplex the visual and mechanosensory signals such that a single neuron encodes both visual stimuli from the compound eyes, and mechanosensory stimuli from the antennal Johnston's organs. Additional experiments at the level of behavior in intact moths reveals that integration of visual and antennal mechanosensory feedback plays a key role in gaze stabilization in flying hawkmoths. Together, these experiments underscore the importance of multisensory integration during flight in hawkmoths.
|
|
|
14:30 to 15:10 |
Collins Assisi (IISER Pune) |
Intrinsic and circuit mechanisms of predictive coding in a grid cell network model Grid cells in the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) fire when an animal is located at the vertices of a hexagonal grid that extends across the environment. The population activity of grid cells serves as an allocentric representation of the current location of the animal. Recent studies have identified a class of grid cells that represent locations ahead of the animal. How do these predictive representations emerge from the wetware of the MEC? To address this question, we developed a detailed conductance-based model of the MEC network, constrained by existing data on the biophysical properties of stellate cells and the topology of the MEC network. Our model revealed two mechanisms underlying the emergence of a predictive code in the MEC. The first relied on a time scale associated with the HCN conductance. The other depended on the degree of asymmetry in the topology of the MEC network. The former mechanism was sufficient to explain predictive coding in layer II grid cells that represented locations shifted ahead of the current location. The shift was equivalent to ~5% of the diameter of a grid field. The latter mechanism was required to model predictive representations in layer III grid cells that were shifted forward by a distance of ~25% of the diameter of a grid field. A corollary of our model, that the extent of the predictive code changes monotonically along the dorsoventral axis of the MEC following observed changes in the properties of the HCN conductance, is borne out by recent experiments.
|
|
|
15:10 to 15:50 |
Tanvi Deora (Shiv Nadar University, Delhi, India) |
Neuromechanics of insect pollination: tactile sensing and learning in nocturnal insects How insects find and feed on flowers is crucial for plant pollination. Plants provide several chemical and visual cues to attract insects. However, even as insects find their host flowers, they have the additional challenge of targeting a tiny nectary opening on floral surfaces to reach the sugary reward. This becomes especially challenging for moths and butterflies because they use a long and flexible mouthpart called proboscis to draw the nectary. Additionally, nocturnal hawkmoths feed while hovering in front of flowers, often at very low lights levels during nighttime. How do moths target the tiny nectary hole in flowers, despite the low visual resolution of the nectary opening? We tracked the motion of hawkmoth proboscis as they fed from artificial, 3D-printed flowers and show that hawkmoths systematically explore floral surfaces to detect tactile features such as curvatures to target the nectary. We found that over repeated visits, they preferentially explore in ways that increases the efficiency of finding the nectary. Systematic exploration and targeting objects in the environment require expert control over appendage movements. How do hawkmoths sense and control the proboscis motion to achieve such precise movements? Pilifers are paired bristled organs at the proboscis base and are well placed to provide proprioceptive feedback about relative movements of the proboscis. To study the role of pilifers as proprioceptive organs, we drove lateral motions of the proboscis in anaesthetized head-fixed moths while simultaneously recording neural responses from the pilifer nerve. Our recordings reveal that pilifer mechanosensory neurons are sensitive to lateral motions, either to the left or to the right. Like other mechanosensory organs, they respond extremely rapidly, often within a few milliseconds. We build neural models which reveal that the neural filtering properties such as the stimulus feature and selectivity function of the pilifer mechosensors are strikingly like other insect mechanosensors, including the strain sensors on wings and halteres, abdominal mechanosensors etc. suggesting an important role for sensor mechanics and motion in encoding relevant information.
|
|
|
16:30 to 17:30 |
Gabriel Mindlin (University of Buenos Aires, Argentina) |
TL II: Dynamical Systems and artificial intelligence applied to data modelling in biological problems. Nonlinear dynamics aims to elucidate the basic mechanisms necessary to reflect the temporal behavior of a natural system. The data analysis and modeling techniques proposed by artificial intelligence (deep networks, computational reservoirs, recurrent networks, as examples), on the other hand, ostensibly resign the mechanistic vision for a data-oriented modeling paradigm. In these lectures, these apparently antagonistic approaches will be analyzed in parallel, using as examples my work on the physics of birdsong production and vocal learning.
|
|
|