The hyperbolic dependence of catalytic rate on substrate concentration is a classical result in enzyme kinetics, quantified by the celebrated Michaelis-Menten (MM) equation [1]. The ubiquity of this relation in diverse chemical and biological contexts has recently been rationalized by a graph-theoretic analysis of deterministic enzymatic networks [2]. Experiments, however, have revealed that “molecular noise” - intrinsic stochasticity at the molecular scale - leads to significant deviations from classical results and unexpected effects like “molecular memory”, i.e., the breakdown of statistical independence between turnover events [3]. Over several years we have developed a stochastic time-based approach which, in combination with the number-based approach, namely the chemical master equation, has unified the results of classical (deterministic) and single-molecule (stochastic) enzyme kinetics within a single theoretical framework [4-6]. In this lecture, a brief overview of classical and stochastic enzyme kinetics will be presented. A novel statistical analysis that uncovers the emergence of molecular memory and non-hyperbolicity in the (non- classical) transient regime, peculiar to stochastic reaction networks of multiple enzymes, will be described. New statistical measures to distinguish between the non-stationary and stationary states in single-enzyme kinetics will be proposed, and their application to experimental data from the landmark experiment that first observed molecular memory in a single enzyme with multiple binding sites will be presented.
References
[1] L Michaelis and M L Menten, Biochem. Z. 49, 333 (1913); U. Deichmann, S. Schuster, and J-P.
Mazat, FEBS J. 281, 435 (2014); A. Cornish-Bowden, Perspect. Sci. 4, 3 (2015).
[2] F. Wong, A. Dutta, D. Chowdhury, and J. Gunawardena, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 9738 (2018).
[3] B. P. English, W. Min, A. M. Van Oijen, K. T. Lee, G. Luo, H. Sun, B. J. Cherayil, S. Kou, and X. S.
Xie, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2, 87 (2006).
[4] S. Saha, S. Ghose, R. Adhikari, and A. Dua, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 218301 (2011).
[5] A. Kumar, R. Adhikari, and A. Dua, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 099802 (2017).
[6] A. Kumar, R. Adhikari, and A. Dua, J. Chem. Phys. 154, 035101 (2021)